<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>LDP - The Legal Week</title>
        <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/</link>
        <description>Aimed at legal professionals, The Legal Week is the Liverpool Daily Post’s essential news and information resource for the region</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:48:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Rumours about DLA and the firm&apos;s robust repsonse</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Philip Rooney.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Philip%20Rooney.jpg" width="105" height="144" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span></p>

<p>LDP Legal yesterday broke the <a href="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/02/dla-to-shed-up-to-140-jobs-nat.html">news</a> that DLA Piper's Liverpool office could lose up to 13 of its support staff in the company's latest round of cuts</p>

<p>But before that story went online, I spoke to solicitors formerly of that parish, as well as managing partner <a href="http://www.dlapiper.com/philip_rooney/">Philip Rooney</a>.</p>

<p>One recently-departed DLA solicitor told me the Liverpool office sits under a cloud of nerves. The former insider said the office feels like Manchester's younger brother and is jumpy about being cut loose from the company altogether.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/02/rumours-about-dla-and-the-firm.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/02/rumours-about-dla-and-the-firm.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blogs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">credit crunch</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">dla piper</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">philip rooney</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">recession</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Why you shouldn&apos;t let your divorce come between you and your dog</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>DIVORCING couples should watch their behaviour in front of their pets, as well as their children, according to a Cheshire lawyer.</p>

<p>Here, <strong>Shelley Hesford</strong> from <a href="http://www.sasdaniels.co.uk">SAS Daniels</a>, says distressed dogs are increasingly becoming factors in how a divorce is conducted - and many couples are underestimating the impact the build-up to divorce and the consequent split can have upon their hound. Her comments are followed by the views of pet care professional <strong>Sarah Walmsley</strong>.</p>

<p>Ms Hesford told LDPLegal.co.uk: "This may well sound frivolous, but a dog has rights and its wellbeing can put huge demands on its owners, and actually cause intense complications when a couple splits up.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/01/why-you-shouldnt-let-your-divo.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/01/why-you-shouldnt-let-your-divo.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">divorce</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SAS Daniels</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">shelley hesford</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Lawyer urges wills scrutiny during crunch</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>A MERSEYSIDE law firm is urging families to review their wills as the credit crisis wreaks havoc with the value of estates. <br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.maceandjones.co.uk/">Mace & Jones</a> private client team warns that with investments and property prices tumbling, wills drafted during the economic boom of the 90s and 00s need urgent review as their provisions may well now be out of date.<br />
 <br />
"Many assets in wills have plummeted in value," said Mace & Jones private client Associate <strong>Paul Bricknell</strong>.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/01/lawyer-urges-wills-scrutiny-du.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/01/lawyer-urges-wills-scrutiny-du.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">mace &amp; jones</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Paul Bricknell</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">probate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">wills</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Desmond Hudson</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Des Hudson.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Des%20Hudson.jpg" width="105" height="137" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.lawsociety.org.uk">LAW Society of England and Wales</a> chief executive <strong>Desmond Hudson</strong> says firms should go green to cut costs.</p>

<p>WITH recent estimates <a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5489134.ece">suggesting</a> that two internet searches through Google produce the same amount of carbon dioxide as boiling a kettle one could be forgiven for discarding any hopes of saving the planet and assuming we're all doomed.</p>

<p>The discovery comes amid increasing warnings about the little-known environmental impact of computer and internet use and adds to the pressure that companies are under to reduce their carbon footprint.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/01/opinion-desmond-hudson.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2009/01/opinion-desmond-hudson.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">desmond hudson</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">law society</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">legal sector alliance</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Andrew Cox</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Andrew Cox.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Andrew%20Cox.jpg" width="105" height="108" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span></p>

<p><strong>Andrew Cox</strong> on the pitfalls of witnesses giving false statements in civil cases.</p>

<p>THE recent case of KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton [2008] is a warning to witnesses who knowingly  give false statements in civil cases, and a reminder to solicitors to inform their witnesses of the  importance of signing a statement of truth.</p>

<p>Giving false evidence carries grave consequences, and the impact of signing a statement of truth,  which must be included in witness statements under the Civil Procedure Rules, should be given  close and careful consideration.</p>

<p>In this case, the Court of Appeal allowed contempt of court proceedings to be brought against Mr  Hinton.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/12/opinion-andrew-cox.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/12/opinion-andrew-cox.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Andrew Cox</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Weightmans</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Paul Hunt</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Paul Hunt.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Paul%20Hunt.jpg" width="105" height="124" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span></p>

<p><strong>Paul Hunt </strong>discusses how it could be decision time for prenuptial agreements in the UK</p>

<p>FOR the first time, a case involving the enforceability of a pre-nuptial agreement has been to the highest court in the UK, the House of Lords.</p>

<p>The case, which originated in the Isle of Man, brought to wider attention the growing pressure to move towards a situation in which such agreements become binding.<br />
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/12/opinion-paul-hunt.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/12/opinion-paul-hunt.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">kirwans</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">paul hunt</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>COMMENT: Law Commission&apos;s bribery law recommendations</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Edward de la Billiere.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Edward%20de%20la%20Billiere.jpg" width="105" height="125" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>The Law Commission today published its recommendations for the reform of the law on bribery.</p>

<p><strong>Edward de la Billière</strong>, head of financial investigations and criminal fraud at national law firm Hill Dickinson, commented:<br />
 <br />
"These Law Commission recommendations for simplifying the law relating to bribery and corruption come after a prolonged period of consultation and criticism of the UK's attitude to and ability to prosecute corruption.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/11/comment-law-commissions-briber.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/11/comment-law-commissions-briber.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">bribery</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">edward de la billiere</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hill Dickinson</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">law commission</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Rex Makin</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Rex Makin.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Rex%20Makin.jpg" width="105" height="95" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span></p>

<p><strong>Rex Maxkin</strong> on the importance of the Criminal Cases Review Commission.</p>

<p>THE Criminal Cases Review Commission established in March 1997 is an independent public body set up by the 1995 Criminal Appeal Act.</p>

<p>The objective was to review possible miscarriages of justice in the criminal courts of England, Wales and Northern Ireland and refer appropriate cases to the appeal courts.</p>

<p>Based in Birmingham, the Commission (CCRC) has about 100 staff, including about 50 caseworkers supported by administrative staff.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/11/-rex-maxkin-on-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/11/-rex-maxkin-on-the.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">criminal cases review commission</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">rex makin</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Helen Broughton</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Helen Broughton.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Helen%20Broughton.jpg" width="105" height="118" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span></p>

<p><strong>Helen Broughton</strong> on the issue of opening family courts to public scrutiny.</p>

<p>FAMILY courts are to be open up to the media in response to controversy over their decisions  and the way they operate.</p>

<p>Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, plans to announce changes next month to create more  transparency in the system.</p>

<p>Newspapers, Families Needs Fathers and other partisan groups are very keen on this. They see  it as protecting families from unfair and unjustified state intervention or, in private law to the  unfairness of alleged prejudicial judges in denying one party their due rights. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/11/opinion-2.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/11/opinion-2.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">family court</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">helen broughton</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Morecrofts</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Rex Makin</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="Rex Makin.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Rex%20Makin.jpg" width="105" height="95" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;"/></span></p>

<p><strong>Rex Makin</strong> says Lay Magistrates' days may be numbered.</p>

<p>THE office of Justice of the Peace goes back hundreds of years, but how long will it last? Magistrates' courts are drying up with business, apart from the Family Courts.</p>

<p>The reason is two-fold: first of all, instead of cases being filtered before they are sent to a higher court, they are dispensed with an alacrity which is the speed of Mercury. The old practice of having oral committals has virtually been abolished and accused people are dispatched to the Crown court. While this has the advantage of speeding up justice, it is also justice denied.</p>

<p>Under the old procedure of oral committals, witnesses were tested and many a charge was dismissed.<br />
The magistrate who heard the committal proceedings was known as the examining magistrate. Now cautions and fixed penalties have dramatically reduced the criminal business of the courts.<br />
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/10/opinion-rex-makin-1.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/10/opinion-rex-makin-1.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">rex makin</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Opinion: Rex Makin</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="Rex Makin.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Rex%20Makin.jpg" width="105" height="95" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;"/></span></p>

<p><strong>REX MAKIN</strong> predicts the closure of many law firms. Here he recounts the toll being taken on the  legal profession </p>

<p>THESE are hard times for the legal profession, or as some people prefer, the legal trade. With  the lack of house sales solicitors who once had the monopoly of conveyancing now find business  of that nature has almost evaporated.</p>

<p>There are other difficulties and some small firms are being forced to close because they cannot  afford to pay the increased indemnity premiums, while hundreds more are destined to end up in the  very costly assigned professional insurance risk pool.</p>

<p>Some firms have chosen to shut down, claiming their inability to find cover in the conventional  market.<br />
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/10/opinion-rex-makin.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/10/opinion-rex-makin.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">rex makin</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Godfrey Freeman</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="Godfrey Freeman.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Godfrey%20Freeman.jpg" width="105" height="130" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;"/></span></p>

<p><strong>Godfrey Freeman</strong> on his first three months as chair of family law group Resolution.</p>

<p>THE first three months as chair of Resolution have, to say the least, been very busy.</p>

<p>After giving the opening address of the conference after my election, I was followed by Mr Justice Coleridge's keynote speech criticising the way the family justice system in England and Wales had been neglected.</p>

<p>The Daily Mail made it front-page news and brought about a media frenzy.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-godfrey-freeman.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-godfrey-freeman.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Godfrey Freeman</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Morecrofts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Resolution</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Sean Crotty</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="Sean Crotty.jpg" src="http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/Sean%20Crotty.jpg" width="105" height="123" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;"/></span><br />
<strong>Sean Crotty</strong> on why file sharers should beware</p>

<p>NOT BEFORE time, the wild west nature of the internet and file sharing is being tamed bit by bit.</p>

<p>Recently, an English court ordered that a woman who illegally downloaded a video game from a file sharing website should pay £16,000 to the copyright holder of the video game.</p>

<p>Many commentators believe that this is the thin end of the wedge, as the court's decision is likely to be one of many since the music, film and video game industries have commenced battle with illegal downloaders. </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-1.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-1.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">sean crotty</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">weightmans</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Bill Chandler</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Bill Chandler assesses the effect empty rates relief reform has had on new and speculative  developments and how if it could cost the industry long-term.</p>

<p>THE RATING regime for empty commercial properties changed significantly when the Rating  (Empty Properties) Act 2007 came into force on April 1, 2008.</p>

<p>Some owners of empty commercial property have been spurred on by the reforms to agree  lettings of empty properties for shorter terms and at lower rents than they may previously have  considered. Such lettings allow property owners to pass on the new rating liability to tenants and to  obtain a new rate free period once the tenant vacates.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-bill-chandler-1.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-bill-chandler-1.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bill Chandler</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hill Dickinson</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>OPINION: Carole Atkinson</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>DISPUTES over children are one of the most difficult and distressing areas of relationship  breakdown. </p>

<p>Almost all disputed cases involving contact or residence are emotionally charged and  complicated.</p>

<p>And as the Fathers for Justice campaign demonstrates men, as well as women, can  be left feeling deeply aggrieved by the process.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-carole-atkinson-2.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.thelegalweek.merseyblogs.co.uk/2008/09/opinion-carole-atkinson-2.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Opinion</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Carole Atkinson</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mace &amp; Jones</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
